The BRAF kinase domain promotes the development of gliomas in vivo

This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

ABSTRACT

In-frame BRAF fusions have been observed in over 80% of sporadic pilocytic astrocytomas. In each fusion, the N-terminal autoinhibitory domain of BRAF is lost, which results in constitutive activation via the retained C-terminal kinase domain (BRAF-KD). We set out to determine if the BRAF-KD is sufficient to induce gliomas alone or in combination with Ink4a/Arf loss. Syngeneic cell lines demonstrated the transforming ability of the BRAF-KD following Ink4a/Arf loss. In vivo, somatic cell gene transfer of the BRAF-KD did not cause tumors to develop; however, gliomas were detected in 21% of the mice following Ink4a/Arf loss. Interestingly, these mice demonstrated no obvious symptoms. Histologically the tumors were highly cellular and atypical, similar to BRAF^V600E tumors reported previously, but with less invasive borders. They also lacked the necrosis and vascular proliferation seen in BRAF^V600E-driven tumors. The BRAF-KD-expressing astrocytes showed elevated MAPK signaling, albeit at reduced levels compared to the BRAF^V600E mutant. Pharmacologic inhibition of MEK and PI3K inhibited cell growth and induced apoptosis in astrocytes expressing BRAF-KD. Our findings demonstrate that the BRAF-KD can cooperate with Ink4a/Arf loss to drive the development of gliomas and suggest that glioma development is determined by the level of MAPK signaling.

INTRODUCTION

Aberrant RAS mitogen activated protein kinase (MAPK pathway) activation is a hallmark of gliomas [1]. Activation of this pathway occurs through mutations or amplifications in receptor tyrosine kinases or downstream signaling mediators such as RAS, RAF, MEK, and ERK [2]. Recently, a novel mechanism involving RAF fusion genes has been identified in pilocytic astrocytomas (PA) that allows for MAPK activation. In-frame fusions between FAM131B and BRAF have been observed in 2% of sporadic PA [3], fusions between SRGAP3 and RAF1 have also been found in 2% of sporadic PA [4], and fusions between KIAA1549 and BRAF have been identified in nearly 80% of sporadic PA samples tested [5– 7]. The majority (>70%) of the KIAA1549:BRAF fusions occur between exon 16 of KIAA1549 and exon 9 of BRAF, but multiple different fusions have been identified [3, 8]. The presence of a BRAF fusion gene is now considered highly diagnostic for PA [9]. These fusions cause anchorage-independent growth when overexpressed in NIH3T3 cells [4, 6] and cerebellar neural stem cell (NSC) cultures [10]. Cerebellar engraftment of NSCs expressing KIAA1549:BRAF in mice led to the formation of glioma-like lesions after a latency of 6 months [10].

In each fusion the N-terminus of RAF is replaced by FAM131B, SRGAP3 or KIAA1549 resulting in loss of the N-terminal autoinhibitory domain of RAF and constitutive activation of the MAPK pathway via the retained C-terminal kinase domain (BRAF-KD) (Figure 1). The specificity with which the C-terminus of RAF fuses to these different genes suggests that it is required for tumorigenesis in this context; however, the role of the C-terminal domain of BRAF within the fusions in glioma formation has not been validated. Expression of a BRAF kinase domain mutant carrying the V600E alteration (BRAF-KD^VE) was sufficient to induce PA-like lesions in mice [11]. However, in patients, the BRAF kinase domain has not been found to be mutated in this manner in the context of a fusion gene. V600E mutations in full length BRAF are seen in a small percentage of PA (6%) [9,12– 14]; however, they are much more common in grade II, and high grade malignant pediatric gliomas; accounting for 18% of grade II, 33% of grade III, and 18% of grade IV tumors (23% grades II-IV) [15]. We have previously demonstrated that BRAF^V600E can cooperate with Ink4a/Arf loss to induce high-grade gliomas in mice [16].

The development of small molecule serine-threonine kinase inhibitors (vemurafenib and dabrafenib) that specifically target mutant BRAF has revolutionized the treatment of melanoma, and clinical trials are underway for treatment of pediatric gliomas carrying the BRAF^V600E mutation (NCT01748149, NCT02034110). However, paradoxically these inhibitors activate MAPK signaling in tumors that do not carry codon 600 mutations, and new small molecule inhibitors designed to break this paradox do not inhibit BRAF fusion mutants at physiologically relevant doses [17]. Furthermore, mutations causing the truncation and loss of the BRAF autoregulatory domain are known to drive resistance to small molecule inhibitors that target the oncogenic codon 600 mutations [10].

In addition to constitutive MAPK activity, mutations targeting the p53/Rb cell cycle pathways are also seen in gliomas. In PA, loss of p16 correlates strongly with reduced senescence, increased cell division, and tumor progression [10, 18]. Higher grade pediatric gliomas demonstrate constitutive MAPK activity, but this is almost always accompanied by homozygous deletion of the cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitor 2A (CDKN2A) locus [13]. This locus encodes both p16 (INK4a) and p14 (ARF) [14, 15]. p16 functions to inhibit CDK4/6 mediated phosphorylation of the Retinoblastoma (Rb) protein, and its loss allows for unregulated cell division [19]. Loss of p14 leads to increased ubiquitination and destruction of p53 by HDM2 [20]. Interestingly, 38.5% of PAs show loss of heterozygosity at 9q21, the location of the CDKN2A locus and homozygous deletion is seen in 6.4% of cases [21]. A follow-up study of PA patients receiving adjuvant therapy after surgery also found 14% of cases had both p16 loss and BRAF rearrangements [22].

In the current study, we used the well-established RCAS/TVA glioma mouse model to assess the role of the BRAF-KD in glioma development in vivo. We show that although the BRAF-KD is not tumorigenic on its own, cooperation with Ink4a/Arf loss leads to the development of relatively indolent but highly atypical and cellular gliomas in vivo.

RESULTS

The BRAF kinase domain promotes anchorage-independent growth

We previously demonstrated the transformative capacity of N-TVA/Ink4a/Arf^-/- astrocytes infected with RCASBP(A) viruses containing CRAF^Δ22W, BRAF^V600E or KRAS^G12D, which form numerous colonies in soft agar [16]. To assess the transforming potential of the BRAF kinase domain BRAF-KD, we infected N-TVA/Ink4a/Arf^-/-astrocytes with RCASBP(A)BRAF-KD and the full length BRAF with the V600E mutation, RCASBP(A)BRAF^V600E(hereafter BRAF-FL^VE). Gene delivery and expression was confirmed by immunoblotting (Figure 2A). Analysis of phosphorylated Erk 1/2 (P-Erk) demonstrated elevated MAPK activation in cells expressing BRAF-KD (Figure 2B). Ink4a/Arf-deficient astrocytes expressing BRAF-KD or BRAF-FL^VE proliferated more rapidly than the negative control; however, there was no significant difference between proliferation of BRAF-KD or BRAF-FL^VE cells (P=0.29; Figure 2C). Whereas Ink4a/Arf-deficient astrocytes did not form colonies in soft agar, expression of BRAF-KD or our positive control BRAF-FL^VE, induced colonies demonstrating their ability to transform cells in the context of altered Rb and/or p53 signaling (Figure 2D). Interestingly, there was a statistically significant difference between the number of colonies formed by BRAF-KD and BRAF-FL^VE expression (P=0.04).

The BRAF-kinase domain promotes transformation and tumor growth in vivo

A more stringent assay of tumorigenic potential is the ability to form tumors in vivo. The cell lines used for these orthotopic studies are syngeneic with the immunocompetent host mouse strain. Therefore, to assess tumorigenicity in vivo, 2 x 10⁴ astrocytes were delivered intracranially to newborn mice, and the mice were monitored for signs of tumor formation. Ink4a/Arf-deficient astrocytes expressing mutant KRAS served as a positive control. Tumors formed within 3 weeks in 100% of mice injected with Ink4a/Arf-deficient astrocytes expressing KRAS^G12D (8/8) or the BRAF-KD(8/8). No tumors formed following the injection of uninfected astrocytes within this time frame. Histologically, the BRAF-KD tumors resembled highly cellular and invasive gliomas; both possessed a diffuse growth pattern but lacked the necrosis and endothelial hyperplasia typical of grade IV tumors, glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) (H&E; Supplementary Figure S1). Expression of the BRAF-KD was confirmed using IHC for the HA epitope Tag (HA; Supplementary Figure S1). MAPK pathway activation within the tumors was assessed using IHC for P-Erk (P-Erk; Supplementary Figure S1). All the tumors expressed the glial progenitor marker Nestin; however, expression of the glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP) was absent (GFAP, Supplementary Figure S1).

Expression of the BRAF-KD in combination with Ink4a/Arf loss induces gliomas in mice

The RCAS/TVA system allows us to deliver genes to somatic Nestin-TVA cells in vivo. This enables determination of the roles of specific genes in glioma initiation and progression. Using this system we previously validated the role of mutant BRAF and canonical MAPK signaling in glioma development and maintenance. We found that intracranial infection of newborn N-TVA/Ink4a/Arf^lox/lox mice with RCASBP(A) viruses containing BRAF-FL^VE, KRAS^G12D or gain of function MEK (MEK^GF) in combination with Cre leads to the development of high grade gliomas of various subtypes and morphologies [16, 27]. Here, we set out to determine if the BRAF-KD is sufficient to induce gliomas in vivo alone or in combination with Ink4a/Arf loss. Newborn N-TVA/Ink4a/Arf^lox/lox mice were infected intracranially with RCASBP(A) virus containing BRAF-KD and/or Cre and survival was assessed over a 12 week period. All mice infected with RCASBP(A) viruses containing BRAF-KD (12/12), Cre (30/30) or BRAF-KD + Cre (29/29) survived the 12-week experimental period. Brain tissue from all injected mice was analyzed histologically. None of the mice infected with RCASBP(A) viruses containing BRAF-KD or Cre alone developed tumors; however, gliomas were detected in 21% (6/29) of mice injected with RCASBP(A) viruses containing BRAF-KD and Cre (Figure 3A). This incidence is not statically different (P=0.15) from our previously published experiments where 38% (10/26) of mice injected with full length BRAF^V600E and Cre viruses developed tumors; however, the mice with BRAF-FL^VE-induced tumors had to be sacrificed before 12 weeks due to tumor burden [16] whereas the BRAF-KD mice demonstrated no obvious symptoms (Figure 3B). Histologic analysis of the brains from the BRAF-KD cohort revealed the presence of tumors, which suggests a distinct progression from the BRAF^V600E-induced tumors. The stark difference in the posthoc survival analysis of tumor-bearing BRAF-KD and BRAF-FL^VE mice (P<0.001) as well as the lower level of P-Erk1 and P-Erk2 (P<0.001) in astrocytes expressing BRAF-KD compared to BRAF-FL^VE suggests that the BRAF-KD tumors are less malignant gliomas (Figure 3B, C). Histologically, the BRAF-KD Ink4a/Arf^-/- tumors were highly cellular with atypical nuclei and mitoses, similar to the BRAF-FL^VE-induced tumors. In contrast to the BRAF-FL^VE-induced tumors, the BRAF-KD–induced tumors showed a more circumscribed, less invasive border. Furthermore, the BRAF-KD-induced tumors had a lower mitotic index compared to BRAF-FL^VE-induced tumors(Figure 4A) [16]. Immunostaining for the cellular proliferation marker Ki-67 demonstrated generally lower cellular proliferation in BRAF-KD tumors compared to BRAF-FL^VE tumors which were consistently highly proliferative (Supplementary Figure S2).

Similar to the BRAF-FL^VE-induced tumors, there was considerable heterogeneity between tumors within the same sections; some were comprised mainly of spindle cells while others were predominantly epithelioid. Several tumors also contained populations of giant tumor cells (Figure 4A). Immunostaining using a C-terminal antibody for BRAF and for the HA-epitope tag confirmed expression of virally delivered BRAF-KD. All of the tumors expressed Nestin, and GFAP expression was present in several smaller tumors (Figure 4B). Together, the lower mitotic index, the lower MAPK activation, and the more circumscribed tumor borders may explain the lack of symptoms observed in these mice at 12 weeks post-injection as compared to BRAF-FL^VE-induced tumors. These distinct features suggest that the tumors driven by BRAF-KD have a later onset or more indolent behavior than tumors driven by BRAF^V600E [16].

MEK and PI3K/mTOR inhibition reduces proliferation and induces significant apoptosis in cells expressing the BRAF-KD

Type 1 BRAF^V600E mutant inhibitors (vemurafenib, dabrafenib) have been demonstrated to cause paradoxical activation of the MAPK pathway in cells expressing the BRAF-KD fusions [17]. Since activating mutations in BRAF drive cell growth and proliferation primarily through canonical MAPK signaling (e.g., BRAF-MEK – ERK), we chose to test the effect of Mek inhibition on the growth of cell lines driven by BRAF-FL^VE and BRAF-KD.The concentration required for the inhibition of Erk phosphorylation with the Mek inhibitor PD0325901 (hereafter 901) in N-TVA;Ink4a/Arf^-/- astrocytes expressing BRAF-FL^VE and BRAF-KD, was determined by titration using 100 nmol/L and 1 μmol/L of 901. Treatment with 0.1μM significantly reduced Erk1/2 phosphorylation and 1 μM of the Mek inhibitor was sufficient for complete blockade (Figure 5A). As expected, we observed a negative-feedback loop between Mek and PI3K signaling – evidenced by the increasing levels of P-Akt with increasing Mek inhibition [27]; therefore, we also targeted PI3K/mTOR signaling using 1 μmol/l of the PI3K/mTOR inhibitor NVP-BEZ235 (hereafter; BEZ). The proliferation of Ink4a/Arf^-/- astrocytes expressing BRAF-FL^VE and BRAF-KD was significantly inhibited by both 901 and BEZ. Combined treatment with 901 and BEZ produced an additive effect (S=1.2, P=0.0633) in the context of the BRAF-KD and synergistic effect in the context of BRAF^V600E (S= 0.516, P=0.0001) as assessed by reduction in cell growth over 96 hours with synergy and additivity calculations performed as described previously (Figure 5B) [27]. A significant increase in apoptosis in BRAF^V600E and BRAF-KD cells was also observed (Figure 5C).

DISCUSSION

While the role of the N-terminal segment within BRAF fusion genes (i.e. KIAA1549, SRGAP3, FAM131b) is unknown, there is evidence to suggest their possible function. SRGAP3 has been proposed to play a role in neurogenesis [28] and contains a Fes/CIP4 Homology (FCH) domain, which has a putative function in regulating the microtubule cytoskeleton [29]. KIAA1549 harbors two transmembrane domains, which have been proposed to tether RAF to the membrane. However, the minimal FAM131b fusion component is only 9 amino acids in size and has no known or predicted function [3]. Our results demonstrate that the BRAF-KD alone can cooperate with Ink4a/Arf loss to drive gliomagenesis in vivo. Deletion of the N-terminal auto-inhibitory domain allows activation of the protein at sufficient levels to drive tumorigenesis. We suspect that the transforming capabilities of the various BRAF fusion genes lies within the BRAF-KD, and the promoters of FAM131b, SRGAP3, and KIAA1549 simply serve to direct expression to the appropriate cells in the brain. Thus, the result of the rearrangements is the loss of the regulatory domain leading to constitutive MAPK activation, a phenomenon that is observed in 80-90% of PAs [30]. While it has been shown before that BRAF-KD^VE can form lesions in mice resembling PA [11], BRAF fusion genes in humans do not harbor the V600E mutation. To our knowledge, this is the first report to show that BRAF-KD can lead to glioma development in cooperation with Ink4a/Arf loss.

Expression of a powerful oncogene, such as BRAF^V600E in otherwise normal cells can prevent proliferation by inducing senescence; this phenomenon, referred to as ‘Oncogene Induced Senescence’ (OIS), is especially common in melanoma where it prevents the progression of benign nevi with BRAF^V600E mutations into melanoma [31]. Loss of p16 expression is a common occurrence in melanoma and interestingly loss of p16 also correlates strongly with reduced senescence, increased cell division, and progression of PAs into WHO grade II astrocytomas [22, 32]. The BRAF-KD Ink4a/Arf^-/-mice demonstrated no obvious symptoms within the 12-week experimental timeframe and survived to endpoint in contrast to the BRAF-FL^VE Ink4a/Arf^-/- mice that began to die from the 3rd week. Other distinguishing characteristics between the BRAF-KD and BRAF-FL^VE include histology showing a lack of necrosis and less invasive borders as well as immunoblotting demonstrating decreased levels of MAPK activation in tumors driven by the BRAF-KD. This suggests that the level of canonical BRAF signaling plays a role in glioma development and progression. Fascinatingly, expression of the full length KIAA1549:BRAF fusion protein has never been detected either in vitro or in vivo, even in KIAA1549:BRAF transgenic mice [33], suggesting that sporadic PA require low levels of BRAF signaling, and that this is one way in which they may escape OIS in the context of p16 expression. Hereditary melanoma–astrocytoma syndrome is characterized by a dual predisposition to melanoma and development of low-grade paediatric astrocytomas. This syndrome is associated with germline mutations that effect only CDKN2A exon 1β, resulting in loss of p14 expression but not p16 expression [34]. For these reasons, future experiments will concentrate on determining the grade and response to treatment of tumors induced with BRAF-KD and either p16 or p14 loss.

MEK inhibition in gliomas is an area of ongoing study. Currently, a clinical trial (NCT02124772) is underway to investigate the efficacy of treating V600E gliomas with a combination of a Trametinib and Dabrafenib. Recently, both drugs have shown limited penetration into the brain due to active efflux across the blood-brain-barrier (BBB) [35, 36]. Thus for our in vitro studies, we opted for 901 because it has been shown to penetrate the BBB [37, 38]. In fact the toxic effects of 901 are likely due to its ability to cross the BBB. The paradoxical activation of the MAPK pathway caused by BRAF^V600E inhibitors could be inhibited by dual BRAF-MEK inhibition as has been observed in melanoma, but the consequence of this is expected to be more p-AKT [39]. As proposed previously, we believe that a combination of 901 and BEZ can serve as a rational cancer therapeutic [27]. To date there have been no clinical trials studying the specific combination of BEZ and 901; however, two trials have examined the combined effect of dual inhibition MAPK and PI3K involving either BEZ or 901. NCT01337765 was a phase 1 trial for studying BEZ with a different MEK compound (MEK162), and NCT01347866 is a currently ongoing phase 1 trial to study 901 with another PI3K-mTOR compound (PF-05212384).

In summary, our findings demonstrate that the BRAF-KD region of the numerous BRAF fusion genes drives gliomagenesis. As cancers with BRAF mutations are often addicted to this signaling pathway, targeting BRAF signaling represents a reasonable therapeutic strategy. However, cells expressing KIAA1549-BRAF fusions genes display paradoxical activation when they are targeted with BRAF^V600E inhibitors (i.e. vemurafenib) [40]. Unfortunately, next generation, paradox breaker BRAF inhibitors that have reduced capacity to paradoxically activate wild-type BRAF do not inhibit BRAF fusions genes at physiologically relevant doses [17, 41]. We previously demonstrated that efficacy of combined MEK and PI3K/mTOR inhibition for the treatment of high-grade gliomas driven by BRAF^V600E [27]; our latest results suggest that combined MEK and PI3K/mTOR inhibition is a rational therapy for the treatment of gliomas driven by fusion genes containing the BRAF-KD as well.

METHODS

Mice and genotyping

Nestin-TVA;Ink4a/Arf^lox/lox mice and genotyping procedures have been described [16]. The mice are on a mixed genetic background consisting of FVB/n, 129, and C57Bl/6. PCR genotyping for the TVA transgene and for the Ink4a/Arf^lox and wild-type Ink4a/Arf alleles was performed as described [16, 23]. All experiments were approved by the IACUC before experimentation.

Establishment of N-TVA;Ink4a/Arf^lox/lox astrocytes in culture

N-TVA;Ink4a/Arf^lox/lox primary astrocytes were established following dissection of newborn mouse brain tissue by physical disruption into single cells using scalpels and 0.25% trypsin. Cell cultures were maintained in RPMI (Invitrogen) containing 10% FBS, and gentamicin at 37°C.

Viral constructs

The retroviral vectors used in this study are replication-competent avian leukosis virus (ALV) long terminal repeat (LTR), splice acceptor, and Bryan polymerase-containing vectors of envelope subgroup A [designated RCASBP(A) and abbreviated RCAS]. RCASBP(A)CRE, RCASBP(A)BRAF^V600E and RCASBP(A)KRAS^G12D have been previously described [16, 23]. RCASBP(A)BRAF-KD was created by PCR amplification from pcDNA3.1 BRAF template DNA, [a gift from Martin McMahon (UCSF)] followed by TOPO cloning into the Gateway entry vector pCR8 (Invitrogen) and recombination into RCASBP(A) DV using LR Clonase Enzyme Mix (Invitrogen) (Forward: atggcgtacccatacgacgtcccagactacgctaaaacactt ggtagacgggactc, Reverse: cagtggacaggaaacgcacca) per the manufacturer’s specifications. To propagate the RCAS viruses, proviral DNA was transfected into DF-1 cells grown at 39°C using the calcium phosphate transfection method [24]. RCAS vectors are replication-competent in the DF-1 cell line, an immortalized chicken fibroblast line, and high titer viral stocks can be obtained [25]. The supernatants were filtered through a 0.45-µm filter, and viral titers were determined as described [26].

Viral infections in vitro

Primary N-TVA;Ink4a/Arf^lox/lox astrocytes were seeded in 6-well plates at a density of 5 × 10⁴ cells/well and were maintained in RPMI with 5% FBS, gentamicin at 37°C as described previously [16]. After the cells attached, 1 mL of filtered virus-containing medium was added in the presence of 8 μg/ml polybrene (Sigma) for 2 h at 37°C in 5% CO_2.

Growth in soft agar

To assess anchorage-independent growth, 1.5 × 10 cells were suspended in 0.35% Difco agar noble (Becton Dickinson) in RPMI with 10% FBS and layered over pre-solidified 0.65% Difco Noble Agar in RPMI with 10%FBS per well of a six-well dish. Each cell line was assayed in triplicate.

Western blotting

Protein concentrations were determined using the Bio-Rad D_C Protein Assay (Bio-Rad). The proteins were separated on a 4-20% Tris-glycine gradient polyacrylamide gel, transferred to nitrocellulose, and incubated for 1 h at room temperature in blocking solution (0.05% Tween-20 in Tris-buffered saline with 5% NFDM or 5% BSA). Blots were immunostained for the following antigens: phospho-Erk at Thr202/Tyr204 (4370, 1:1000, Cell Signaling); total Erk (9102, 1:1000, Cell Signaling); tubulin (T9026, 1:5000, Sigma); HA epitope on BRAF-KD (HA.11, 1:1000, Covance); C-terminus of BRAF (SC166, 1:500, Santa Cruz Biotechnology); and BRAF^V600E (E1929, 1:2000, Spring Bioscience). The blots were then incubated with an anti-mouse or anti-rabbit IgG-HRP secondary antibody, incubated with ECL solution (Amersham), and exposed to film (Kodak).

In vivo infection

Infected DF-1 cells from a confluent culture in a 10-cm dish were trypsinized, pelleted, resuspended in 50 μL PBS, and placed on ice. Newborn mice were injected intracranially 2 mm ventral from bregma (intersection of the coronal and sagittal sutures) with 5 μL of infected DF-1 cells using a gas-tight Hamilton syringe as described previously [16, 27].

Histological analysis

Brain tissue from injected mice was fixed in 10% formalin, embedded in paraffin and 5-µm sections were adhered to glass slides. The sections were stained with hematoxylin and eosin or left unstained for immunohistochemistry (IHC). Images were captured using a Zeiss Axio microscope equipped with an AxioCam ICc3 camera (Zeiss).

Immunohistochemistry

Tissue sections were de-paraffinized and antigen retrieval was performed in ‘Diva Decloaking’ buffer (Biocare Medical) by boiling for 10 min. Sections were treated with 3% H₂ O₂ and blocked in Background Sniper (Biocare Medical) for 10 min. Primary antibodies were diluted in Renaissance background reducing diluent (Biocare Medical). Sections were incubated overnight at 4°C and probed with Mach 4 rabbit polymer reagent (Biocare Medical) or Mach 4 mouse probe for 15 min followed by Mach 4 polymer for 15 min for mouse monoclonal antibodies. Visualization was carried out with DAB (Biocare Medical). Sections were counterstained with hematoxylin. Antibodies against the following antigens were used: GFAP (13-0300, 1:500, Invitrogen); synaptophysin (ab32127, 1:200, Abcam); BRAF-KD (detected using an antibody to the HA epitope (HA.11, 1:1000, Covance) and C-terminal BRAF antibody (SC166, 1:500, Santa Cruz Biotechnology); Nestin (ab6142, 1:200, Abcam); phospho-Erk (4370, 1:100, Cell Signaling); and Ki-67 (M7249, 1:50, Dako) using a rabbit anti rat linker (P0450, 1:50, Dako)

Drug Treatment

To measure the effect of MEK inhibition on phosphorylated Erk (P-Erk) in astrocytes expressing BRAF constructs, drug was serially diluted in 10 fold increments in RPMI containing 2% FBS and added to cells in 6-well plates. 0.1% DMSO vehicle was added in negative control wells. After 1 h, cells were washed twice in PBS before analysis by Western blot. To measure the effect of the MEK inhibitor PD0325901 or the PI3K/mTOR inhibitor NVP-BEZ235 on cell proliferation as measured by ATP levels, drug was diluted to 1.0 µM and added to astrocytes. After 96 h, ATP levels were detected using the ATPlite 1step Luminescence Assay System (Perkin Elmer) following the manufacturer’s instructions. In brief, 100µl of reconstituted ATPlite reagent was added to cells in a 96-well plate. The plate was incubated on an orbital shaker at 700rpm for 3 min and dark-adapted for 10 min before luminescence was read for 0.1 sec per well on a Synergy HT multi-mode microplate reader (BioTek). To measure the effect of the MEK inhibitor PD0325901 or the PI3K/mTOR inhibitor NVP-BEZ235 on apoptosis, drugs were diluted to 1.0 µM and added to astrocytes. After 96 h, the cells were resuspended in Guava Viacount reagent (Millipore) and 5000 events per sample were read according to the manufacturer’s instructions as described previously [27]. All drug treatment experiments were done in three biological replicates.

Statistical Analysis

Western blot density analysis was performed using Image J. Kaplan Meier survival data analysis and determination of synergy between PD032509 and NVP-BEZ235 were done as previously described [27]. To compare means, two-tailed Student’s t test was used. P values below 0.05 were considered significant.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

This work was supported by the Huntsman Cancer Institute; the National Brain Tumor Foundation; the American Cancer Society [RSG-06-198-01-TBE]; and the National Institutes of Health [R01NS073870]. We thank Joshua Sonnen for his helpful comments about histology. We also thank Rowan Arave for her assistance.

• 1. Abounader R. Interactions between PTEN and receptor tyrosine kinase pathways and their implications for glioma therapy. Expert Rev. Anticancer Ther. 2009;9:235–45. [PubMed] https://doi.org/10.1586/14737140.9.2.235.
• 2. Kondo Y, Hollingsworth EF, Kondo S. Molecular targeting for malignant gliomas (Review). Int. J. Oncol. 2004;24:1101–9. [PubMed]
• 3. Cin H, Meyer C, Herr R, Janzarik WG, Lambert S, Jones DTW, Jacob K, Benner A, Witt H, Remke M, Bender S, Falkenstein F, Van Anh TN, et al. Oncogenic FAM131BBRAF fusion resulting from 7q34 deletion comprises an alternative mechanism of MAPK pathway activation in pilocytic astrocytoma. Acta Neuropathol. 2011;121:763–74. [PubMed]
• 4. Jones DTW, Kocialkowski S, Liu L, Pearson DM, Ichimura K, Collins VP. Oncogenic RAF1 rearrangement and a novel BRAF mutation as alternatives to KIAA1549:BRAF fusion in activating the MAPK pathway in pilocytic astrocytoma. Oncogene. Nature Publishing Group; 2009;28:2119–23. [PubMed] https://doi.org/10.1038/onc.2009.73.
• 5. Forshew T, Tatevossian RG, Lawson ARJ, Ma J, Neale G, Ogunkolade BW, Jones TA, Aarum J, Dalton J, Bailey S, Chaplin T, Carter RL, Gajjar A, et al. Activation of the ERK/MAPK pathway: a signature genetic defect in posterior fossa pilocytic astrocytomas. J. Pathol. 2009;218:172–81. [PubMed]
• 6. Jones DTW, Kocialkowski S, Liu L, Pearson DM, Bäcklund LM, Ichimura K, Collins VP. Tandem duplication producing a novel oncogenic BRAF fusion gene defines the majority of pilocytic astrocytomas. Cancer Res. 2008;68:8673–7. [PubMed] https://doi.org/10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-08-2097.
• 7. Sievert AJ, Jackson EM, Gai X, Hakonarson H, Judkins AR, Resnick AC, Sutton LN, Storm PB, Shaikh TH, Biegel J a. Duplication of 7q34 in pediatric low-grade astrocytomas detected by high-density single-nucleotide polymorphismbased genotype arrays results in a novel BRAF fusion gene. Brain Pathol. 2009;19:449–58. [PubMed] https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1750-3639.2008.00225.x.
• 8. Tatevossian RG, Lawson ARJ, Forshew T, Hindley GFL, Ellison DW, Sheer D. MAPK pathway activation and the origins of pediatric low-grade astrocytomas. J. Cell. Physiol. 2010;222:509–14. [PubMed]
• 9. Lawson ARJ, Tatevossian RG, Phipps KP, Picker SR, Michalski A, Sheer D, Jacques TS, Forshew T. RAF gene fusions are specific to pilocytic astrocytoma in a broad paediatric brain tumour cohort. Acta Neuropathol. 2010;120:271–3. [PubMed]
• 10. Kaul A, Chen Y-H, Emnett RJ, Dahiya S, Gutmann DH. Pediatric glioma-associated KIAA1549:BRAF expression regulates neuroglial cell growth in a cell type-specific and mTOR-dependent manner. Genes Dev. 2012;26:2561–6. [PubMed] https://doi.org/10.1101/gad.200907.112.
• 11. Gronych J, Korshunov A, Bageritz J, Milde T, Jugold M, Hambardzumyan D, Remke M, Hartmann C, Witt H, Jones DTW, Witt O, Heiland S, Bendszus M, et al. An activated mutant BRAF kinase domain is sufficient to induce pilocytic astrocytoma in mice. J. Clin. Invest. 2011;121:1344–8. [PubMed] https://doi.org/10.1172/JCI44656.
• 12. Zhang J, Wu G, Miller CP, Tatevossian RG, Dalton JD, Tang B, Orisme W, Punchihewa C, Parker M, Qaddoumi I, Boop F a, Lu C, Kandoth C, et al. Whole-genome sequencing identifies genetic alterations in pediatric lowgrade gliomas. Nat. Genet. 2013;45:602–12. [PubMed] https://doi.org/10.1038/ng.2611.
• 13. Schiffman JD, Hodgson JG, VandenBerg SR, Flaherty P, Polley M-YC, Yu M, Fisher PG, Rowitch DH, Ford JM, Berger MS, Ji H, Gutmann DH, James CD. Oncogenic BRAF mutation with CDKN2A inactivation is characteristic of a subset of pediatric malignant astrocytomas. Cancer Res. 2010;70:512–9. [PubMed] https://doi.org/10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-09-1851.
• 14. Chin L, Pomerantz J, DePinho R a. The INK4a/ARF tumor suppressor: one gene--two products--two pathways. Trends Biochem. Sci. 1998;23:291–6. [PubMed]
• 15. Roussel MF. The INK4 family of cell cycle inhibitors in cancer. Oncogene. 1999;18:5311–7. [PubMed]
• 16. Robinson JP, VanBrocklin MW, Guilbeault a R, Signorelli DL, Brandner S, Holmen SL. Activated BRAF induces gliomas in mice when combined with Ink4a/Arf loss or Akt activation. Oncogene. Nature Publishing Group; 2010;29:335–44. [PubMed] https://doi.org/10.1038/onc.2009.333.
• 17. Sievert AJ, Lang S, Katie L, Madsen PJ, Slaunwhite E, Choudhari N, Kellet M, Storm PB, Resnick AC, Kjetland EF, Atkins KE, Poolman EM, Evan W, et al. Paradoxical activation and RAF inhibitor resistance of BRAF protein kinase fusions characterizing pediatric astrocytomas. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 2013;110:8750–8750. [PubMed] https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1219232110.
• 18. Tatevossian RG, Tang B, Dalton J, Forshew T, Lawson AR, Ma J, Neale G, Shurtleff SA, Bailey S, Gajjar A, Baker SJ, Sheer D, Ellison DW. MYB upregulation and genetic aberrations in a subset of pediatric low-grade gliomas. Acta Neuropathol. 2010;120:731–43. [PubMed] https://doi.org/10.1007/s00401-010-0763-1.
• 19. Quelle DE, Zindy F, Ashmun R a, Sherr CJ. Alternative reading frames of the INK4a tumor suppressor gene encode two unrelated proteins capable of inducing cell cycle arrest. Cell. 1995;83:993–1000. [PubMed]
• 20. Ivanchuk SM, Mondal S, Rutka JT. p14ARF interacts with DAXX: effects on HDM2 and p53. Cell Cycle. 2008;7:1836–50. [PubMed]
• 21. Horbinski C, Hamilton RL, Nikiforov Y, Pollack IF. Association of molecular alterations, including BRAF, with biology and outcome in pilocytic astrocytomas. Acta Neuropathol. 2010;119:641–9. [PubMed] https://doi.org/10.1007/s00401-009-0634-9.
• 22. Horbinski C, Nikiforova MN, Hagenkord JM, Hamilton RL, Pollack IF. Interplay among BRAF, p16, p53, and MIB1 in pediatric low-grade gliomas. Neuro. Oncol. 2012;14:777–89. [PubMed] https://doi.org/10.1093/neuonc/nos077.
• 23. Holmen SL, Williams BO. Essential role for Ras signaling in glioblastoma maintenance. Cancer Res. 2005;65:8250–5. [PubMed]
• 24. Kingston RE, Chen CA, Okayama H. Calcium phosphate transfection. Curr. Protoc. Cell Biol. 2003;Chapter 20:Unit 20.3. [PubMed]
• 25. Schaefer-Klein J, Givol I, Barsov E V, Whitcomb JM, VanBrocklin M, Foster DN, Federspiel MJ, Hughes SH. The EV-O-derived cell line DF-1 supports the efficient replication of avian leukosis-sarcoma viruses and vectors. Virology. 1998;248:305–11. [PubMed]
• 26. Smith EJ, Fadly A, Okazaki W. An enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay for detecting avian leukosis-sarcoma viruses. Avian Dis. 23:698–707. [PubMed]
• 27 Robinson JP, Vanbrocklin MW, Lastwika KJ, McKinney a J, Brandner S, Holmen SL. Activated MEK cooperates with Ink4a/Arf loss or Akt activation to induce gliomas in vivo. Oncogene. Nature Publishing Group; 2011;30:1341–50 [PubMed]
• 28. Bacon C, Endris V, Rappold G. Dynamic expression of the Slit-Robo GTPase activating protein genes during development of the murine nervous system. J. Comp. Neurol. 2009;513:224–36. [PubMed]
• 29. Yang Y, Marcello M, Endris V, Saffrich R, Fischer R, Trendelenburg MF, Sprengel R, Rappold G. MEGAP impedes cell migration via regulating actin and microtubule dynamics and focal complex formation. Exp. Cell Res. 2006;312:2379–93. [PubMed]
• 30. Jones DTW, Gronych J, Lichter P, Witt O, Pfister SM. MAPK pathway activation in pilocytic astrocytoma. Cell. Mol. Life Sci. 2012;69:1799–811. [PubMed] https://doi.org/10.1007/s00018-011-0898-9.
• 31. Michaloglou C, Vredeveld LCW, Soengas MS, Denoyelle C, Kuilman T, van der Horst CM a M, Majoor DM, Shay JW, Mooi WJ, Peeper DS. BRAFE600-associated senescence-like cell cycle arrest of human naevi. Nature. 2005;436:720–4. [PubMed]
• 32. Cancer T, Atlas G. Comprehensive genomic characterization defines human glioblastoma genes and core pathways. Nature. 2008;455:1061–8. [PubMed] https://doi.org/10.1038/nature07385.
• 33. Kaul A, Chen Y-H, Emnett RJ, Gianino SM, Gutmann DH. Conditional KIAA1549:BRAF mice reveal brain region- and cell type-specific effects. Genesis. 2013;51:708–16. [PubMed] https://doi.org/10.1002/dvg.22415.
• 34. Randerson-Moor J a, Harland M, Williams S, Cuthbert-Heavens D, Sheridan E, Aveyard J, Sibley K, Whitaker L, Knowles M, Bishop JN, Bishop DT. A germline deletion of p14(ARF) but not CDKN2A in a melanoma-neural system tumour syndrome family. Hum. Mol. Genet. 2001;10:55–62. [PubMed]
• 35. Vaidhyanathan S, Mittapalli RK, Sarkaria JN, Elmquist WF. Factors Influencing the CNS Distribution of a Novel MEK 1/2 Inhibitor: Implications for Combination Therapy for Melanoma Brain Metastases. Drug Metab. Dispos. 2014; [PubMed] https://doi.org/10.1124/dmd.114.058339.
• 36. Mittapalli RK, Vaidhyanathan S, Dudek AZ, Elmquist WF. Mechanisms limiting distribution of the threonineprotein kinase B-RaF(V600E) inhibitor dabrafenib to the brain: implications for the treatment of melanoma brain metastases. J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther. 2013;344:655–64. [PubMed] https://doi.org/10.1124/jpet.112.201475.
• 37. Barrett SD, Bridges AJ, Dudley DT, Saltiel AR, Fergus JH, Flamme CM, Delaney AM, Kaufman M, LePage S, Leopold WR, Przybranowski S a, Sebolt-Leopold J, Van Becelaere K, et al. The discovery of the benzhydroxamate MEK inhibitors CI-1040 and PD 0325901. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. Elsevier Ltd; 2008;18:6501–4. [PubMed]
• 38. Rice KD, Aay N, Anand NK, Blazey CM, Bowles OJ, Bussenius J, Costanzo S, Curtis JK, Defina SC, Dubenko L, Engst S, Joshi AA, Kennedy AR, et al. Novel Carboxamide-Based Allosteric MEK Inhibitors: Discovery and Optimization Efforts toward XL518 (GDC-0973). ACS Med. Chem. Lett. 2012;3:416–21. [PubMed] https://doi.org/10.1021/ml300049d.
• 39. Kudchadkar R, Paraiso KHT, Smalley KSM. Targeting mutant BRAF in melanoma: current status and future development of combination therapy strategies. Cancer J. 18:124–31. [PubMed] https://doi.org/10.1097/PPO.0b013e31824b436e.
• 40. Schnetzke U, Fischer M, Frietsch JJ, Finkensieper A, Clement JH, Hochhaus A, Rosée P La. Paradoxical MAPKactivation in response to treatment with tyrosine kinase inhibitors in CML: Flow cytometry loses track. Cytometry B. Clin. Cytom. 2013;17:601–3. [PubMed]
• 41. Le K, Blomain ES, Rodeck U, Aplin AE. Selective RAF inhibitor impairs ERK1/2 phosphorylation and growth in mutant NRAS, vemurafenib-resistant melanoma cells. Pigment Cell Melanoma Res. 2013;26:509–17. [PubMed] https://doi.org/10.1111/pcmr.12092.

PII: 48